• Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Human society has never truly changed. This is literally what our civilization was built on.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      Completely disagree. Anthropologic evidence from the past and knowledge gained by studying current primitive tribes suggest that there was much greater equity in our past.

      We’re kinda like in between chimpanzees and bonobos. We started off more like bonobos but as history marches on we become more like chimpanzees.

      • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Maybe it comes and goes.

        Because the fact that the majority of civilizations fought and killed each other throughout known history kinda tells me we’ve been at this game for a while now.

        And I feel like only in the last 20-30 years have we decided - hey, maybe that’s not so cool anymore?

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          Perhaps. I mean yeah the history of humanity over the past 2000 years has been brutal. But we go back much farther than that.

          I have a real problem with you saying that in the last 20-30 years humanity has chilled out. We’ve got multiple genocides going on, constant religious conflict, land war in Europe. The United States is so fucked I can’t even begin to list the reasons why, and it’s on the brink of some really bad things.

          How many people can you kill with a club? How many people can you kill with a sword? How many people can you kill with a gun? How many people can you kill with a cluster bomb?

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      (Copying my comment on a similar, older post, because I really want to share this info again since I think it’s fascinating:)

      The notion that the early formation of societies was based on security rather than empathy is outdated. Compassion has many evolutionary advantages, especially in primate species where offspring are born vulnerable. It’s clearly evident in other primates who live in groups (or ‘societies’), as a driving force of cooperation and group cohesion.

      Here’s a recent paper (2022) by Penny Spikins, PhD at the University of York, Department of Archaeology, that explores how compassion shaped early human evolution and the formation of societies: The Evolutionary Basis for Human Empathy, Compassion and Generosity.

      And here’s another from 2011 by Goetz et al that explores in detail the evolutionary advantages of compassion: Compassion: An Evolutionary Analysis and Empirical Review.

      Those papers are both fascinating reads, and I highly recommend them for a deeper understanding of why and how empathy is crucial to our success as a species.

      (For a couple of centuries, the narrative has been humans are warlike and that’s what dominated our development, but that’s simply not true. We’ve been that way for the past couple thousand years, but largely not before that. I’ll leave up to the reader what significant ‘development’ coincided with that shift in our overall behaviour.)