Rules: explain why

Ready player one.

That has to be one of the cringiest movies I’ve seen, is tries so hard, too hard with it’s “WE LOVE YOU NERD, YOU’RE SO COOL FOR PLAYING GAMES AND GETTING THIS 80S REFERENCE” message and the whole “corporation bad, the people good” narrative seems written for toddlers… The fan service feels cheap and adds nothing to the story.

Finally, they trying to make the people believe that very attractive girl with a barely visible red tint spot on her face is “ugly”… Like wtf?

Yet it received decent reviews plus being one of the most successful movies of that year.

  • IMongoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s the only way to enjoy it imo. If you watch it seriously you’ll be like, wtf is this shit. But if you imagine the wachowski being like, look at this bullshit I made them do, it becomes a sort of meta comedy. I am not joking when I say I was in a state of bewilderment before the heist scene. Then I busted out laughing because of how ridiculous it was and the movie became enjoyable.

    • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      The irony is the matrix has always been “meta”. Repeatedly breaking out of each paradigm to show you the last one was an illusion. So in a weird way it is a proper sequel, just not in a way that anyone’s going to like.

      • Platypus@lemmings.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not like that though. The other movies it worked with the lore, Resurrections just mocks itself outside the universe just to get a “haha” fuck that.