nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-21 month agoVideo Games can't afford to look this goodwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up159arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: gaming@beehaw.org
arrow-up155arrow-down1external-linkVideo Games can't afford to look this goodwww.nytimes.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-21 month agomessage-square33fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: gaming@beehaw.org
minus-squaredatavoidlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoPeople aren’t playing the original version anymore though?
minus-squareampersandrew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoBut it doesn’t have cutting edge graphics now that it’s 7 years older just because it technically runs on the newer version of the engine under the hood. It runs on phones, after all.
People aren’t playing the original version anymore though?
But it doesn’t have cutting edge graphics now that it’s 7 years older just because it technically runs on the newer version of the engine under the hood. It runs on phones, after all.