nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-22 days agoVideo Games can't afford to look this goodwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: gaming@beehaw.org
arrow-up154arrow-down1external-linkVideo Games can't afford to look this goodwww.nytimes.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square31fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: gaming@beehaw.org
minus-squaredatavoidlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoPeople aren’t playing the original version anymore though?
minus-squareampersandrew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoBut it doesn’t have cutting edge graphics now that it’s 7 years older just because it technically runs on the newer version of the engine under the hood. It runs on phones, after all.
People aren’t playing the original version anymore though?
But it doesn’t have cutting edge graphics now that it’s 7 years older just because it technically runs on the newer version of the engine under the hood. It runs on phones, after all.