Alphane Moon@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agoThe influencer lawsuit that could change the industrywww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up124arrow-down148cross-posted to: aiop@lemmy.worldcolor
arrow-up1-24arrow-down1external-linkThe influencer lawsuit that could change the industrywww.theverge.comAlphane Moon@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: aiop@lemmy.worldcolor
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 days agoI was pro-defendant before the end of the first paragraph. Someone suing someone else for ‘stealing’ their ‘minimalist aesthetic’ deserves to lose and get a lesson from the ol’ clue by four.
minus-squarefmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 days agoWait… Sounds like you are still pro-defendant?
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·9 days agoYes. “I was pro-defendant before the end of the first paragraph.” = “I agreed with this position before the end of the first section of words” Without something to negate that statement, the statement’s meaning is exactly what it says.
I was pro-defendant before the end of the first paragraph. Someone suing someone else for ‘stealing’ their ‘minimalist aesthetic’ deserves to lose and get a lesson from the ol’ clue by four.
Wait… Sounds like you are still pro-defendant?
Yes. “I was pro-defendant before the end of the first paragraph.” = “I agreed with this position before the end of the first section of words”
Without something to negate that statement, the statement’s meaning is exactly what it says.