cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/2399016

Twitter’s new X logo wasn’t made by an in-house designer. It’s from an old podcast hosted by one of the cult that Elon took from his replies.

    • koper@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not accurate. Copyright and trademark are two different things. The name “twitter” is also just a combination of preexisting characters and the word was probably in use before the company was founded. You can still trademark existing things because trademarks are about preventing consumer confusion, not protecting original creations.

      Musk does have a problem with copyright if it turns out this specific design was made by someone else.

  • helpimnotdrowning@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not to defend musk, but it’s not from one specific font. The logo is just Unicode char 1D54F, a blackboard bold X/“MATHEMATICAL DOUBLE-STRUCK CAPITAL X”

    • electromage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      A character is nothing without a font though. When you look at a character on-screen, it’s being rendered in a specific font. Typing that Unicode character in “Special Alphabets 4” produces the image in question.

      • Gamma@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The character (𝕏) doesn’t actually doesn’t exist in the font, because supporting arbitrary Unicode characters in every font would be absurd. Paste it into the font preview and it renders a black square.

          • Gamma@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course there are fonts that support every character, the characters themselves would be useless if they couldn’t be rendered by anything. I’m only saying that this specific font doesn’t support the character.

            • MJBrune@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh, I see, I misread. That’s interesting. So it looks like it’s typically just a glyph.

  • thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does Musk even have any “In-house” designers anymore? Figured those were let got with the rest of the teams.

  • bermuda@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    fonts are ridiculously cheap if you’re a billionaire. Musk is stupid, but I doubt he’d be so stupid he didn’t pay the like $200 fee.

    • nzodd@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If your font has the potential to be made into a logo, you would think the designer would have the sense to negotiate a higher rate. I have no idea if that’s how it is in practice, but to do otherwise seems quite foolish.

  • JuliusSeizure@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    His boring is your life that you feel like this is something important enough to think about, no less write rants about?