madthumbs@lemmy.worldM to Linuxsucks@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoA bragging point destroyedlemmy.worldimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down125file-text
arrow-up1-14arrow-down1imageA bragging point destroyedlemmy.worldmadthumbs@lemmy.worldM to Linuxsucks@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekillingspark@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·5 days ago Even if you, as a developer, create a completely static executable file, there’s no guarantee that glibc will have backwards compatibility. Creates a “completely static” binary. Still links dynamically to glibc instead of using musl or some other libc. Blames Linux.
Creates a “completely static” binary. Still links dynamically to glibc instead of using musl or some other libc. Blames Linux.