As written, the proposed remedies will force smaller and independent browsers like Firefox to fundamentally reexamine their entire operating model.

  • scratchee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    They didn’t “build” their business model on it so much as “clung desperately onto the only lifeline in existence to avoid drowning in debt”.

    There really isn’t a plan b, it’s not like they’re refusing to switch to the obviously better business models out there that could replace their search money. There just aren’t many business models that can maintain the development costs of a web browser and engine.

    • MonkderVierte
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      You mean Mozilla? Developing a browser doesn’t cost 300 million a year.

    • bloup@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Mozilla could solicit donations for the development of Firefox while also still being able to rely on commercial funding sources if they restructured the Firefox project so that the core technologies underlying it (stuff like Gecko and SpiderMonkey) were actually developed by the Foundation instead of the Corporation, while the Corporation could package all of those pieces together into a complete software product with branding. The way things are now, though the entire browser is developed by the Mozilla Corporation and so its development can only be financially supported by Mozilla Corporation selling products or engaging in business deals.