usernamesAreTricky to politics @lemmy.world · 21 hours agoBig loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to $15 broadband law | ISPs fear more states will regulate prices as New York law survives challengearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up170arrow-down11cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziparstechnica_index@rss.ponder.cat
arrow-up169arrow-down1external-linkBig loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to $15 broadband law | ISPs fear more states will regulate prices as New York law survives challengearstechnica.comusernamesAreTricky to politics @lemmy.world · 21 hours agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziparstechnica_index@rss.ponder.cat
minus-squarebdonvr@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·8 hours agoYes, but not a monopoly held by private interest who want to milk it for every penny. It would be public and as such much easier to control through democratic means.
Yes, but not a monopoly held by private interest who want to milk it for every penny. It would be public and as such much easier to control through democratic means.