alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 20 hours agoVeteran Starfield developer surprised by sheer number of loading screens added late in development – “it could have existed without those”www.videogamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1112arrow-down12cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1110arrow-down1external-linkVeteran Starfield developer surprised by sheer number of loading screens added late in development – “it could have existed without those”www.videogamer.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square16fedilinkcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-squaretacosanonymous@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45·20 hours agoThey should have added a computer on your ship for quests/turn-ins. Loading screens suck but making you go through eight of them in a row is inexcusable.
minus-squareMagiilaro@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·16 hours agoStrange I never encountered more then four in a row (and those numbers are rare for me) how can someone get to eight? This is a honest question, how?
They should have added a computer on your ship for quests/turn-ins. Loading screens suck but making you go through eight of them in a row is inexcusable.
Strange I never encountered more then four in a row (and those numbers are rare for me) how can someone get to eight? This is a honest question, how?