• henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      22 hours ago

      To some extent, yes. However, history has a tendency to repeat itself, and generally we see that there’s only so much inequality that people can take for so long. Deny them a peaceful option for change, and violence becomes inevitable.

      To be clear, this is not a threat. It’s an observation, and history’s promise.

    • ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      In the US, to get what we deserve we’ve been killing businessmen and politicians since before the country was formed. Just a few years ago a whole mob of idiots tried to kill our Congress.

  • crusa187
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Well obviously they wouldn’t have to worry if they stopped putting profits over people and gave people good service and fair coverage.

    So of course, they’re now demanding we pay them more via state-funded private security to protect them from further violence.

    • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      A for-profit business must put profits over people. That’s why health care must never be a for-profit business.

      • crusa187
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Huh, interesting. I wonder who is paying politicians to ensure this predatory behavior is never regulated in the healthcare industry.

        Could it be the executives whose primary compensation consists of company stock, which only gains value as they continue to systematically murder people by denying necessary medical care coverage? I wonder.