• StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Bluesky chased black people off the platform right at the start when they allowed racial slurs in usernames. They are currently chasing trans people off the platform by refusing to ban Jesse Singal for harrasment.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Bluesky seems to want users to pick 3rd-party moderators, what they call “Labelers”:

      https://www.bluesky-labelers.io/

      It’s not a bad concept, reducing Bluesky’s expenses and involvement, while at the same time allowing each user to “pick and choose” the moderation that they’d prefer. The downside, is that 3rd-party moderators might not be able to “ban” at a scale of over 10 million users.

      (PS: somewhat ironically, Bluesky turns out to be more complex than Mastodon, since you need to subscribe to a bunch of Labelers, instead of moderation being baked into whatever instance you pick)

  • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Mastodon was complicated

    and full of racists/white supremacists (still is).

    • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t see them there.

      Best thing about Mastodon is no insidious algorithm forcing stuff on you to specifically make you angry.

      • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Well, they exist. Probably because a lot of the harrasment goes on in DMs or in followers only posts (or instances block them or they do dogwhistles etc).

        Yes, but people are, regardless, still awful and so it’s not a place me or many others would recommend precisely because not many care enough to do anything about it. Which is exactly why I try to.

        • Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah. It’s pretty telling that my entire time on Mastodon has been punctuated by black users complaining about how much racism they’re exposed to on the network, and everyone else going “I don’t see any racism!”

          Like, ok, maybe you don’t. I don’t. I’m as white as snow, and don’t post about my experiences as a racialized person (not being one, and all). But it’s pretty clear, just from seeing the same exchange over and over again, that racialized people are experiencing something I’m not, and them expressing as much has Defenders of the Faith circling wagons every time it comes up.

          Mastodon being a little more complicated than Twitter wouldn’t have been a major blocker to communities coming over. “Hey, join this site”, rather than “join Mastodon!” is all you need. But no one’s going to be telling black folks, or any other community, to come on over if the social atmosphere is at least as toxic as where they’re coming from.

          Now with another alternative, Mastodon also needs to be better than “not being Twitter”. And the people who are there already seem to have zero interest in doing that.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Comparing the “racism” present on a federated service to that on a centralized one doesn’t make sense. You can say certain instances of the service fail to adequately moderate racism, but there are so many niche pockets of mastodon that most people are exposed to, and moderated by, completely different groups.

            To make a slightly more nerdy analogy, it’s like someone saying “the windows desktop experience is better than Linux”. Well Linux doesn’t come with a desktop interface, so that statement doesn’t make sense. Which of the dozens of windowers/distros are you talking about? I’m sure the criticism is fair, but it doesn’t contain enough information to make any real claim.

            So it’s not unreasonable for one person to say “I see racism on Mastodon” and many others to say “I never see it”, and not just because of the races of the people involved. “Mastodon” refers to a protocol, not the various ecosystems that use it.

            • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              The problem in many cases isn’t that they don’t literally see it but that they aren’t aware of what constitutes racism a lot of the time. That’s the primary issue here. That and they don’t listen to those that have to endure the harrasment, or don’t believe them.

          • andyburke@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I don’t use Mastodon so I have no idea what’s going on, but I am curious what y’all in this thread would want Mastodon to do.

            Can’t you set up an instance and moderate it to your preference like other federation style apps?

            What specific features are you saying are needed to make Mastodon more usable for any community that might find itself feeling less than welcome?

            • Kichae@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              People have had standing requests, and even PRs, for features for years. Many of them are for exact kinds of things Bluesky has implemented. Some have been for similar features but at the server level.

              The requests have gone unheard, the PRs have been ignored. So, what I’d have Mastodon do is listen to those requesting better self-safety features, or hurry up and die so development team that actually gives a shit can gain some traction.

              • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I mean tools help somewhat but really the solution is on a social level, for people to start giving a shit.

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Like you I’m confused at the continual cries of racism on Mastadon. I’ve been on there for months and never seen it. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist but I’m confused as to how it is “full of racists/white supremacists” but I never bump into them or see it.

            I don’t want to doubt anyone’s experience but I’m at a loss to explain why my feed is so different from other peoples.

            • Kichae@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Like you I’m confused at the continual cries of racism on Mastadon.

              I, uh, said I’m not confused by the cries of racism. I’m confused by the constant claims of “I don’t see any, therefore it must not exist”.

              It’s like no one gives a shit, because it doesn’t affect them personally. Which, you know, makes everyone the kind of people that those experiencing harassment don’t want to be around anyway.

            • JCPhoenix@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Same. And I am a racial minority (though not black, so that may color things…excuse the unintentional pun). That said, on Mastodon, I mainly interact with the people on my instance. And it’s small. There’s probably only a core group of like 50 active individuals, and I’m one of them. So there I’m not surprised I don’t see racism.

              Interestingly, I have the same experience on even the proprietary social media sites. I was on Twitter from 2009 to 2023. I can’t say I was ever served up far-right content by the algorithms. I’m still on YouTube; same experience. Same on Instagram. Same on Bluesky.

              I’m not trying to discount other people’s experiences, and I’ve seen the horrible tweets referenced in news articles and reddit comments and such. So I know it exists, but why am I not being served this content, while so many others apparently are? I mean, I’m OK with not getting far right wing content, lol. Leave me out of it! Makes my online life easier and more enjoyable. But it’s just odd.

              • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                YouTube…that reminds of a conversation I had here on Lemmy a while back. The subject of right wing political content on YouTube came up and I had the same “I don’t encounter that” comment that I just made in regards to Mastadon.

                After a bit of back and forth I realized that I don’t engage with political content of any type on YT so the algorithm doesn’t push it at me. It seems that YT doesn’t do a good job of classifying political content as to its lean. So once you start engaging with political content the algorithm starts suggesting all kinds of it.

                It’s the same with social justice and racial issues. I don’t engage with that kind of content on YT or Mastadon, don’t see it my feeds, and it’s not being pushed at me by the algorithm.

                I don’t know if that explains it completely but there has to be some reason(s) why some of us don’t see this stuff while other people see it all the time.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Do you think this is a systemic problem, or just the happenstance of today? Is there something about Bluesky’s architecture or governance that makes it more resilient against that (particularly in the long term)? Or will they have all the same problems as they gain more users and enable more federation with other servers?

      • OhNoMoreLemmy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I mean the fundamental problem is that humans are dicks and moderation is always needed. It should also be paid, and supported with counciling and recovery time when needed. Dealing with toxic content is a job.

        Federation isn’t very good at this. The tech is great but everyone is a volunteer and there’s (afaik) no global ban hammer so trolls move from one instance to another. Bluesky currently has venture capital to pay for moderation teams, and centralized ban options.

        I don’t know how long this can last without advertising revenue though.

        • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Though I’m not human, I’ve been part of many unpaid moderation teams and I agree. It should be paid and with breaks etc.

          Something which not afforded us when we tried to ask or push for it many times sadly and so it goes with moderation, people just don’t care enough to pay us a lot of the time as we, can only get paid if those using the service pay the mods or those in charge of it do. However, many don’t, won’t or can’t. To be clear though this isn’t just on federated services, this was also on commercial services too.

          Thankfully the instances we are on people do support the mods, from what we are aware, but still, a lot more could be done if people could do these things, fairly though not everyone can due to being poor, but some do help out.

          We don’t agree with your assertion that humans (and probably others) are inherently dicks, but they can certainly display horrible behaviour, yeah.

      • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I mean, it is a systemic problem in that society is racist, social media reflects that. It could be the one to change that in part if people cared enough to fix things both online and off. But they don’t, they’re so dedicated to upholding the structures of white supremacy and remaining willfully ignorant that they end up caring just about themselves.

        Having said that, whilst Bluesky may or may not care about moderation on a global level (I’ve heard mixed things), I think this kind of community building and user level block lists is a good thing, so it may work out for now.

        Like all commercial ventures into anything online I do expect it’ll become enshitified eventually, but for now may it long continue and hopefully drive the devs, moderators and actual users of the fediverse to care and introduce better moderation features or actually care about doing it and stopping the many white supremacists etc on the network through various means.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Thanks for the info. I was not aware that Bluesky had public, shareable block lists. That is indeed a great feature.

          For anyone else like me who was not aware, I found this site with an index of a lot of public block lists: https://blueskydirectory.com/lists . I was not able to load some of them, but others did load successfully. Maybe some were deleted or are not public? I’m not sure.

          I’ve never been heavily invested in microblogging, so my first-hand experience is limited and mostly academic. I have accounts on Mastodon and Bluesky, though. I would not have realized this feature was available in Bluesky if you hadn’t mentioned it and I didn’t find that index site in a web search. It doesn’t seem easily discoverable within Bluesky’s own UI.

          Edit: I agree, of course, that there is a larger systemic problem at the society level. I recently read this excellent piece (very long but worth it!) that talks a bit about how that relates to social media: https://www.wrecka.ge/against-the-dark-forest/ . Here’s a relevant excerpt:

          If this truly is the case—if the only way to improve our public internet is to convert all humans one by one to a state of greater enlightenment—then a full retreat into the bushes is the only reasonable course.

          But it isn’t the case. Because yes, the existence of dipshits is indeed unfixable, but building arrays of Dipshit Accelerators that allow a small number of bad actors to build destructive empires defended by Dipshit Armies is a choice. The refusal to genuinely remodel that machinery when its harms first appear is another choice. Mega-platform executives, themselves frequently dipshits, who make these choices, lie about them to governments and ordinary people, and refuse to materially alter them.

  • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    super cool! glad to hear Black Twitter gets to be a more formal thing now for black users, with moderation by the community for the community.