• superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    https://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

    Also, it’s pretty weird that on one hand there seems to be a design standard that’s universally considered desirable for a website, and on the other hand, the technology specifically built to make websites didn’t allow for that.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t like the holy grail layout. I want the whole page to be scrollable.

      Just put the menu and items on the top, I’ll block the ads so put those wherever, and I’ll just scroll down if I ever want to see the footer, which I won’t.

      I’m here to read the content. Show me a screen full of content.

      • Silverchase@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The holy grail thankfully isn’t around much on the modern web. It was very much a product of a time when web browsing always happened on a 4:3 monitor.

    • underisk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s so many ways to do it properly these days that it almost feels like they overcorrected.

    • DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      The OG way is still the only universally supported one for e-mail templates. So it’s Thug table Life until further notice, I guess.

    • Ben Hur Horse Race@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      yo

      I only ever did freehand html back in the 90s… i took a web design class at a comminity college back then and when we got into css I stopped going