If this is the way to superintelligence, it remains a bizarre one. “This is back to a million monkeys typing for a million years generating the works of Shakespeare,” Emily Bender told me. But OpenAI’s technology effectively crunches those years down to seconds. A company blog boasts that an o1 model scored better than most humans on a recent coding test that allowed participants to submit 50 possible solutions to each problem—but only when o1 was allowed 10,000 submissions instead. No human could come up with that many possibilities in a reasonable length of time, which is exactly the point. To OpenAI, unlimited time and resources are an advantage that its hardware-grounded models have over biology. Not even two weeks after the launch of the o1 preview, the start-up presented plans to build data centers that would each require the power generated by approximately five large nuclear reactors, enough for almost 3 million homes.

https://archive.is/xUJMG

  • anonvurr@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I mean isn’t it already that is included in the datasets? It’s pretty much a mix of everything.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Not everything in the dataset is retrievable. It’s very lossy. It’s also extremely noisy with a lot of training data that’s not education-worthy.

      I suspect they’d make a purpose-built model trained mainly on what they actually would want to teach especially from good educators.