If anyone can explain how it can be 3.3 ounces in the new can and 3.6 in the old while grams and millilitres remain the same i would love to know.

The damn can is also ever so slightly smaller you can see it very well but you can feel it and measure it

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    By the power of a quick search, I’m told that 3.6 OZ is actually 102 grams, while 3.3 OZ is 93.6. 96 grams is 3.38 OZ, so one has to assume they’re starting from grams and rounding down (even though they’d be justified to report 3.4 instead, honestly). It’s not fluid ounces because that’d be somewhere in the region of 5, again according to search.

    So most likely, it’s a typo of some sort, or proof that non-metric systems should be banned by all humanity. This is also how European basketball players grow several centimeters when they start playing in the NBA.

    Interestingly, pictures of the product online alternately show 104 and 96 grams. Volume wouldn’t have to change, because you can just pressurize the can less to include less product. Oh, and yet another search tells me the reported net weight should not include the weight of the propellant.

    Also, what are you doing buying Beckham’s spray deodorant? Multiple times? I mean…

    • Zier@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Just to add; it’s clearly measured by weight because 150 ml is 5 fluid ounces. And my comment, buy unscented deodorant and an actual bottle of cologne, it smells nicer.

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah the whole situation makes no sense.

      As far as buying multiples im alllergic to something in some deodorants and i get rashes under my arms. This one hasn’t so I have been using it for over 10 years. I have many many cans in the cupboardbecausewr buy them when they come half price.

      My wife likes the smell I like the smell too.

      And as far as I know it’s not evil right?

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Oh, no, I’m mostly joking. It’s just… celebrity “lifestyle brands”, you know? Or maybe you don’t know. I’m certainly the type of person that buys “deodorant” brand deodorant, I may be the outlier here.

        • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Nah had no idea when i first bought it. It was just cheap and it didn’t hurt me haha.

          I’ve never even thought about the David beckham relevance at all