• explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    What evidence would make you think BCH has failed and you might be wrong about something? Fewer than [some number] on-chain transactions per year?

    • tusker@monero.townOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      As long as BCH upholds the original design of Bitcoin, which is peer to peer decentralized e-cash then it has not failed. BTC has already failed in that purpose. When will you admit this?

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Still works fine on my machine, and it’s gotten a lot more popular, so saying that it’s failed sounds pretty outlandish at this point.

        Since I’m arguing that market evidence is useful, I would admit BTC has failed once BCH/BTC >> 1 for a few months.

        • tusker@monero.townOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          BTC fees shoot up every couple months and it becomes completely unusable and you just have to wait a week for it to clear out, this is a currency that has failed. The price mania is fueled by people who have never sent a bitcoin transaction, they just hit the buy button on an exchange, they do not yet realize what they are buying is a fake. Eventually reality will set in when BCH dominates the transaction volume and it becomes obvious that BTC is fool’s gold.

                • tusker@monero.townOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  and sometimes it’s $5, then there is a requirement to wait for confirmations which BCH does not have thus makes payments instant as Bitcoin was designed to have. The point is BTC is crippled on purpose to be unusable as a reliable payment system as not to threaten the bankers monopoly over currency.

                  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    21 days ago

                    No it’s not. I’ve never paid $5 for a transaction in all these years because that is not how the mempool works. Here’s a screenshot from literally right now with it cranked up all the way to next block. Whoever is saying $7 above is deliberately misleading you.

                    0-conf was never secure; you guys just declared it so because you have no L2.

                    Bro. It’s nearly a decade later. All time high. LN is working. Gresham’s Law still exists. It sucks to get scammed but we’d love to have you back. You don’t have to do this to yourself.