• Lyrl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Partisan primaries tend to produce more extreme candidates. The hope is switching to a combined primary will result in moving candidates of more general appeal on to the general election.

    • LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I understand that. My question was: why is a primary needed in the first place? It makes sense with first past the post, but with ranked choice voting and instant runnoff, I don’t get why. Does the US constitution require state to organise primaries?

      • Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Primaries can have so many candidates the median voter is never going to learn about all of them. A primary is a reasonable way to down-select to a candidate pool where they all have a chance to make their case to voters without being seen as noise.