November 19, 2024

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Wouldn’t it be an obvious part of the price they will pay for the electricity? The electricity producer or whatever intermediate in charge of the waste, will bill its work for waste storage, and it will end up on the bill of the energy consumer. What am I missing?

    • federal reverse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      54 minutes ago

      You’re missing that no one ever invested in nuclear if they didn’t expect to socialize storage cost. The premise is completely absurd too — you can’t keep anything safe for over 100k years. There’s no way to ensure that people won’t dig up rocks, even on a 500-year horizon.

      The entire history of humanity is only 300k years long, and our languages as well as our societal systems of organization are much younger.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Long term storage is not supposed to require maintenance over that time, the worry is rather preventing people to dig them up unknowingly in the future. Actually dangerous wastes have way smaller half lives that that.