Amazon saved children’s voices recorded by Alexa even after parents asked for it to be deleted. Now it’s paying a $25 million fine.::“For too long, Amazon has treated children’s sensitive data as its own property,” Josh Golin, executive director of Fairplay, said in a statement.

  • EatMyDick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lolololol 25% of profits for keeping on to recordings for too long? You people are insane. You just hate Amazon and want to stick it to them.

    The irony is none of these lemmy instances are run by companies with registrations and can do whatever the fuck they want when your data yet everyone is a okay cause pinky promise I hate Reddit too! 🤦‍♂️

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      A penalty should be something you want to avoid. A 25 million (occasional) fine for Amazon is like asking me to pay a .25 (occasional) fine for, say, no parking. It has no deterrence.

      On the other hand, a percentual on the profits is a lot more deterrent, expecially for a company. Maybe 25% is too much, I agree, but let’s say a 2-5% of the profits is not that bad.

      Note that a fine that is a percentual of your profits (or income) is far more balanced because it hurts the small and the big company the same way.

    • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      25% of profits for wilfully breaching privacy law… that’s actually quite low given what creative accounting can do for profits.

      GDPR maximum fine is 4% of global turnover. Luckily for amazon it’s capped otherwise they’d be on the hook for billions.

      • EatMyDick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Christ, that type of penalty has no bearing of actual damages. They kept the data longer than another party thought was needed. The actual damage was minimal. They have a robust set of controls and are one of the better tech companies to work with in regards to child protection. A whole hell of a lot more than these lemmy instances doing literally nothing to protect childrens data.

    • eleitl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can somewhat trust some people with your data if there is no profit motive. You can’t trust a corporation or a government. Ever.