G.O.P. lawmakers whose leaders have pressed to roll back transgender rights around the country moved to bar Sarah McBride, the first transgender member of Congress, from women’s rooms on Capitol Hill.

In Washington this week for new member orientation, Ms. McBride was still sitting through mandatory cybersecurity trainings, setting up her payroll, selecting district offices and learning how to introduce a bill when her new Republican colleague, Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, announced plans to introduce a measure to bar transgender women from using women’s restrooms and changing rooms in the Capitol complex.

Ms. Mace did not try to pretend that she was doing anything other than targeting one individual with her resolution, even though it would apply to all employees and officers of the House.

“Sarah McBride doesn’t get a say,” she told reporters on Monday night. “I mean, this is a biological man.” She said that Ms. McBride “does not belong in women’s spaces, women’s bathrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms — period, full stop.”

MBFC
Archive

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Conservatives are such fucking wimps.

    Oh no, muh holy bathroom. MUH WORLD ORDER.

    It’s insane to me those morons are the same species.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I really hope this backfires and creates a wave of support for McBride.

    Kinda like their attempts at attacking AOC just made her more popular.

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Counter with tabling a bill to make the bathrooms all gender neutral.

    If the cunts are gonna be counts, at least force em to keep admitting it out loud so people keep seeing it.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Note that in US, to table something is to put it aside and stop considering it for now. The opposite of the UK meaning.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Do I have understand her position correctly?

    Trans woman in locker room…no

    sex offender as AG…yes

    rapist as POTUS…AOK!

    • Tramort@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They want to make sure the trans woman is in their bathroom because they fantasize about it.

      This is creepy AF

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    the party of “gun control laws only hurt law abiding citizens” insists that bathroom laws are about protecting people and not about deliberately hurting law abiding citizens

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      From the people who say “No Gun Signs won’t stop guns!” comes “Women Only Signs will stop Sex Predators.”

      Even though most sex predators are white cismen and transwomen are more likely to be preyed upon than to do the preying…

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hear me out: she should own this and use the men’s room. And I mean USE it. Get as melodramatic, exaggerated, and make those men uncomfortable as hell. Make yourself known when you enter, be loud, be messy, take up 3/4 of the counter space.

    • Lumelore (She/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I heard someone else suggest she should get a porta potty and wheel it around the house of representatives on a pallet jack and be annoying as possible with it. That way she can still piss them off and not have to risk any danger using the men’s room.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Cuz who the fuck cares?

      I really need someone to explain to me what they’re doing in the bathroom that is so sensitive to the presence of other people and their particular genitalia.

      When I use a public bathroom, my goal is to get in and get out with zero interpersonal interaction. I don’t want someone to do so much as hold the door open for a quarter-second. If you’re my best friend in the outside world — in here, I don’t know you.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Why? They’re not disabled and a bathroom is just a bathroom. It’s just Rs creating a problem where there isn’t one.

    • AngryRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They’re not disabled? Also, does the Capitol HAVE bathrooms in sets of 3? Women’s, mens, and handicapped?

        • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Because they’re not disabled. What are you even talking about?

          That’s like supporting some racist segragationist bullshit by saying “well, can’t black people just use disabled bathrooms? They’re a small portion of the population.”

          See how ridiculous that sounds? It’s not disparaging to disabled people to point out how inappropriate that is. You’re just making life harder for disabled people to feed some asshole’s bigotry.