• dottedgreenline
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it has to be a choice and both actually need to happen. It sounds like you just want to continue eating meat despite everything you know.

    Also the ethics of killing sentient creatures for the pleasure of taste aside, the problem is one, as you said of economy and scale of industry, which compounds both the natural effects and the cruelty, to not only the slaughtered but the slaughterer and the consumer too. What we’re both saying is the capitalist system is inherently shit for our environments, but I believe that killing animals for our pleasure is also bad for our psyches.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m saying what is the most efficient way to save the planet. If you convince 500 people to stop eating meat vs. convince 500 CEOs to reduce wasting energy and generating pollution. Which one is likely to be helpful? I can guarantee that convincing 500 people to stop eating meat isn’t going to have any impact on climate change at all. Even 500 million switching away from meat wouldn’t have the same impact as 500 CEOs. Concentrate on the things that are both impactful and possible.