free@rss.ponder.catMB to BBC@rss.ponder.catEnglish · 16 hours ago‘Do not pet’: Why are robot dogs patrolling Mar-A-Lago?www.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up114arrow-down1external-link‘Do not pet’: Why are robot dogs patrolling Mar-A-Lago?www.bbc.comfree@rss.ponder.catMB to BBC@rss.ponder.catEnglish · 16 hours agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareshalafi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·13 hours agoHeadline: Why is the Secret Service Doing Their Job? Why would the USSS not use effective (assuming it is) protection for the President elect, a man who has had two recent assassination attempts? I wouldn’t cry if a shooter got past them, but neither am I going to clutch my pearls about professionals being professionals. Look at the dumbass comments on here already. Apparently the USSS needs to slack off if their subject is a piece of shit?
minus-squaredaddy32@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoO have a mixed feelings about protecting rapists, murderers, raping-murderers etc…
Headline: Why is the Secret Service Doing Their Job?
Why would the USSS not use effective (assuming it is) protection for the President elect, a man who has had two recent assassination attempts?
I wouldn’t cry if a shooter got past them, but neither am I going to clutch my pearls about professionals being professionals.
Look at the dumbass comments on here already. Apparently the USSS needs to slack off if their subject is a piece of shit?
O have a mixed feelings about protecting rapists, murderers, raping-murderers etc…