MataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square367fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down1172
arrow-up1939arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netMataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square367fedilink
minus-squaredev_nulllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down2·1 month agoYeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
minus-squareT156@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 month agoCoal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
minus-squaremoitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·1 month agoThe comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment. You’re interpreting.
Yeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
Coal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
The comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment.
You’re interpreting.