And what would happen if we did?

    • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Should. They should be taxed extremely heavily to try and stop that loop hole and abuse of power.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        What about loans against assets like houses? I wouldn’t consider simple house owners necessarily rich and they should be able to get a mortgage without penalty.

        • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          You know, you can just do things. Like, laws don’t need to be applied unilaterally. You can, at the same time, tax a 100,000,000 dollar loan, and not tax a 1,000,000 dollar loan.

          Kind of like how generally, low income people do not pay much or any income taxes, or how certain products are subject to additional sales taxes.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Exclude a mortgage for your primary residence, capped at the median house price or something… And only exclude it IF it is paid back in full over a max period.

          This is the case in the Netherlands… paid back in full after max 30 years… No cap in how much. This was because the interest on the mortgage are tax deductible. So some bankers figured… we keep the loan maxed, and put your paybacks in a special fund… and at the end of the 30 years the fund pays back the mortgage. That way we get max interests and you get max tax break. In the end the banks made a lot of public funds private this way.

    • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why? Are any loans ever taxed?

      There were tax evasion schemes in the UK where wealthy people could take loans from an offshore entity they contributed to and never pay the loans back. But this was shutdown fairly quickly by HMRC (British IRS) and a bunch of people were fined / went to jail. Don’t know if the same is true in America?

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        If a loan is acting as income (like it does for the ultra wealthy) then it should be treated like income and taxed accordingly.

            • Windex007@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              My mortgage was many times my yearly income.

              So then you just have frequency, which is easily gamed by getting fewer larger loans. Maybe one every three to five years? At that point it really is just a mortgage with stock as collateral rather than a house.

              Like, you’re not wrong in your intuition that the system is problematic. Mine (and others) point is that the devil is in the details, and they’re not trivial.

              • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                But then the value goes WAAY up. Let’s assume you live in a very good house, and mortgage it you’re able to get 5 million out of it. Do you think someone like Jeff Bezos could live for 5 years with that?. You can do it fairly straightforward, everytime you take a loan, the full amount of that loan gets added, after a period of 5 years that value disappears, if at any point that value goes above 10 million, you start paying taxes on it. And the higher it goes the more tax you pay on it, just like how income tax has brackets, and just like how up to certain values are exempt.

                For you or me if we were ever loan 10 million over 5 years we wouldn’t have a way to pay it back. For an Uber wealthy they do that fairly quickly, Bezos mention costs 600k a month, so he’ll get into the first bracket from just that in a year and a half.

                People need to realize just how big the gap is, there are plenty of ways to tax extremely rich people without affecting the middle class by just putting the bracket so high up that it’s impossible for a middle class to reach it.

                • Windex007@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The problem isn’t that i “don’t understand the gap”. The problem is that this isn’t what I’m asking.

                  How do you define for the purposes of this hypothetical law which loans would be taxed as income?

                  Telling me how rich Bezos is is completely tangential.

                  I’ve been trying to use the Socratic method to prime the pump that

                  -The root of the problem isn’t the loans themselves, it’s that they can “realize value” from shares (using them to secure a loan) without selling them.

                  But that doesn’t seem to have gotten anywhere because of how excited people are to hear any question to be somehow a doubting of how rich these guys are?

                  If that is the case, and you step back, can you consider an alternative strategy besides just some messy spaghetti definition of “income loans” vs other loans?

                  • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Read my answer before replying, I provided a solution for that’s and it’s a solution based on the astonishing difference between what high middle class people and super rich make.

                    I’ll repeat it, every dollar you take from a loan gets tallied, and expires after 5 years. Whenever that value goes beyond 10 million you start paying taxes on the loans. You, or any high middle class person, won’t be able to take that many loans in such a short period of time, simply because it would mean that you need at least an income of 2 million per year just to repay those loans, and I think we can agree that’s not high middle class.

                    This way there’s no loophole on the type of loan.