dantheclamman@lemmy.worldM to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agoLong-term nuclear waste warning messagesen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up196arrow-down10
arrow-up196arrow-down1external-linkLong-term nuclear waste warning messagesen.wikipedia.orgdantheclamman@lemmy.worldM to Wikipedia@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareApytele@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·12 hours agoThat’s what the last respondent under the “cultural research” section said and I too want to know why the only sane respondent was listed last.
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoBeing listed last isn’t bad. It has been found that humans mostly remember that which was said first and last in a long presentation. As for why it was listed last, I can think of a few reasons, the most logical is that you normally write an article in this sort of order: Title Summary Description Critics Conclusion And it is a fair way of doing it, first presenting the subject and and then critiquing it.
minus-squareApytele@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-210 hours agodeleted by creator
That’s what the last respondent under the “cultural research” section said and I too want to know why the only sane respondent was listed last.
Being listed last isn’t bad.
It has been found that humans mostly remember that which was said first and last in a long presentation.
As for why it was listed last, I can think of a few reasons, the most logical is that you normally write an article in this sort of order:
Title
Summary
Description
Critics
Conclusion
And it is a fair way of doing it, first presenting the subject and and then critiquing it.
deleted by creator