• Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    It absolutely is assault at should be reported as such.

    It is an implicit threat.

    Get a fucking clue.

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I 100% guarantee you, not one single police officer in my town would take the woman’s side in this scenario. Right or not, its just how it would go.

      • unphazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Let the court decide. Jury of peers would see it as a threat. Get enough cases like this and cops would start to see it as normal fighting (If you claim assault, so will they) and both parties will start to get off with warnings. One of which will reconsider saying such things again.

    • Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      You might be right that it is an implicit threat and as a threat it constitutes verbal assault, but you’d have a hard time making any real headway in court with that, especially in a he said/she said situation. It might be a crime, but it’s one which will see almost no prosecution.