Lemmy is a worse platform for women than Reddit was EDIT this link is an OLD POST that contains my thesis on the state of lemmy and is not the context of the much more recent comment in the screenshot. sorry for any confusion caused by this juxtaposition, my main goal with having this linked is to expose how nothing has improved

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      it’s a tongue in cheek response against a wildly inappropriate comment blaming women for their victimhood. certain people hate to be called out for their violence-enabling rhetoric and that’s precisely what’s happening here.

      • glilimith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        And yet, based on context clues (upvotes on other replies), we can guess that the downvotes on that comment are based on its tone and not based on its message, which other comments delivered quite successfully. This is the exact definition of cherrypicking.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          “oh noooo the comment defending women for being inexcusably insulted for wanting to preserve a modicum of dignity used sarcasm?”

          tone policing behavior like yours makes this site miserable

            • araneae@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              “Woman is not made for having sex. Woman is person.”

              You’re doing a jig around this statement to refute the idea people weren’t hostile to the person who said this :)

              • glilimith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Hostility to a person is not hostility to a message. There were other people saying the same thing and getting upvoted for it :)

                • araneae@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  No no but that comment boiled it down to a few clear cut words, no bullshit. And that’s the controversial part; the truth of the statement. ‘No cunt indefinitely’ is three words so personally I like it better.

                  Nobody in that thread wants to listen to a woman actually speak when they can talk over her and feel good about themselves. When she put it plainly they downvoted her. Pretty obvious.

                  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago
                    CW misogynist language but for a pro feminist joke

                    call it 4c instead, cunt cancelled considerably & collectively

      • glilimith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I just feel like it’s always better to use real examples than manufactured ones, and holding up troll comments like this can do more harm than good for the cause.