GitHub - boredsquirrel/browserscript-fedora-atomic: A simple interactive script to install Brave (stable, beta, nightly) or Vivaldi on Fedora Atomic
github.com
A simple interactive script to install Brave (stable, beta, nightly) or Vivaldi on Fedora Atomic - boredsquirrel/browserscript-fedora-atomic

Easily install your favourite browsers on Fedora Atomic Desktops, Silverblue, Kinoite, uBlue, Bazzite, Aurora, Bluefin, Secureblue etc.

  • dev_null
    1·
    1 month ago

    I am not aware of any definition of closed source published by OSI.

    • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
      1·
      1 month ago

      Since it is source available, it isnt open source and therefore closed source.

      Edit: we obviously have different definitions. I did not mean to argue over semantics. I would personally never trust a browser with proprietary code, even it is source available.

      • dev_null
        1·
        1 month ago

        Fair enough. Yeah, I never thought of open and closed source as two exclusive options, but two of many.

        I myself publish an application which isn’t open source, but I publish the source code, as I believe my users have the right to know what runs on their computer, and have the freedom to audit, modify, and compile their own builds if they so wish. But I don’t want someone to take and resell my application. I have yet to encounter someone calling my app closed source, but I can see how someone could.