• oce 🐆@jlai.luOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    From the article:

    The article mentions “SUV-ization” of the bycicle.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      the ‘form factor’ isn’t the problem. a ‘cool’ tricked-out bike could just be cosmetics, tire size and suspension; and still have a legally allowed motor output and a safe rider.

      it’s the modifications to bypass power limits (some can go 60+ km/h, where the legal limit is closer to 25) or swap out motors for much stronger ones, and how reckless some people ride.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      the difference is that’s objectively cool whereas there’s nothing cool about an SUV

      • oce 🐆@jlai.luOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        What makes you think the reasons you think this is cool is different from the reasons why other people find SUV cool? This article mentions the similarities.

        • oo1@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Just add 2 more wheels and a big bumper front and back, maybe a passenger seat or two and a trailer behind it, enclose it in a weatherproofing shell then it’d be cooler.

          /s