• Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    US manufacturing currently sat at 26 GW annually, with a 71% increase in the first quarter of the year. Demand being high is also unsurprising.

    • TheOubliette
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Over a year delay is clearly demonstrable undercapacity

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yes, most certainly. Spikes in demand can do that. If 71% growth remains consistent, it’ll be resolved in short order. Though it’ll probably dip as the overall manufacturing capacity increases, since its just a percentage of the total.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            Makes sense, Biden’s big investment was just a few years ago. A single year out for medium-sized facilities is very manageable though. Hopefully demand continues to increase alongside production, and it remains a years wait for several years. That would be a sign that demand is continuing to increase.

            • TheOubliette
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              19 days ago

              Biden’s “big investment” went to finance and high tech wages, not production capacity.

              And no it’s not particularly manageable the industry will need a bailout or fail shortly. They were already bailed out once w/ Silicon Valley Bank, if you recall. They were all rolled up in that. It is needed again because they are not doing well.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 days ago

                No, actually it went heavily to infrastructure to facilitate future technology, things like electric vehicle charging stations and energy grid, along with more mundane stuff like bridge maintenance and replacement. This stimulates demand, which supply naturally follows in the quest for profits-above-all-else.

                Not sure how an industry seeing such demand is projected to fail shortly.

                SVB wasn’t bailed out, it was actually seized. It failed after a bank run following a lot of risky investments into new tech startups, which is a naturally high risk market. It was not due to some sort of failure in the broader solar industry.

                • TheOubliette
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  No, actually it went heavily to infrastructure to facilitate future technology

                  No it went to stock buybacks and capitalization for startups.