• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    Do you think they don’t understand that? Everyone understands that. You seem unwilling to move beyond that and confront a broader perspective than the vote of one person.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      They keep arguing for an alternate choice where there is none, so, yeah, I’m pretty sure they aren’t getting it.

      • Count042
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        No, they aren’t. That literally is nowhere in their post.

        You either didn’t read it all, or you’re lying, or you have poor reading comprehension skills.

        I doubt it’s the latter for a mod on a text based platform.

        P.S. I’m an admin on a fairly large platform for a fairly large group. When the group took off, I started interacting on it a LOT less because my moderation responsibilities (which also increased with the groups growth, why are so many people just blatant assholes or trolls?) required that people view me as impartial and unbiased.

        Choosing to engage frequently in controversial topics and using straw man arguments against posts that literally don’t say anything related to what you say they say is certainly… a choice… for a mod to make.

        Don’t get me wrong, I miss my ability to interact with the group I admin like a normal person, but my duties to the group take precedence. I understand the desire, but there are other options.