1. Mod of !anarchism@slrpnk.net posts a great Greta Thunberg quote, but then tries to use it to justify not voting in the upcoming US election
  2. Multiple people point out that’s very clearly not what she meant
  3. Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod Removed by mod

Using your mod powers to decide who is allowed and not allowed to speak is not very anarchist of you, @mambabasa@slrpnk.net

  • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Isn’t “we lack agency” the exact argument you removed? Casting others in either black or white is unnecessarily flaming and often used by power-grabbers to divide the electorate and drum up perfervid support. Nobody’s wholly supporting Harris or supporting her stance on the war here. I saw the thread before it was removed.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Something Awful forums apparently have some sort of sitewide account ban for strawmanning, saying that someone said something which clearly isn’t what they said, so you can get upset at them about the thing they didn’t say. The longer I stay on Lemmy, the more I think that kind of rule is a great idea.

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not sure if it’s a permaban. Apparently their system is that accounts cost $10 for the lifetime of the account, but you can’t get out of line in certain ways, strawmanning being one of them, or you might get a temp ban or lose your account entirely and have to pay another $10.

          I don’t know that much about it but I think it sounds great. I don’t know how you could ever bring that energy to Lemmy, but it sounds a lot better than the “let’s invite all the mysterious new accounts with strong opinions about the Democrats to come and play as hard as they want, oh also we ban because today you disagreed with a mod” philosophy.

          • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            With that hypothetical system, who would be in charge of deciding the strawmanning? Seems hard to implement in a federated system

            • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              The wider concept, where they put actuality to the idea that every account on the network is a privilege and if you’re a jerk there’s a real penalty, I don’t think you could do on Lemmy. It’s just not the culture here.

              I think it would be possible for one community to have a rule that if you pretend someone else said something they clearly didn’t say, it’s a temp ban. It would be difficult for a certain crop of user accounts to deal with, but I think those are exactly the ones that aren’t adding anything but suffering to the conversation, so nothing would be lost by booting them until they learned. I think it would be a good idea. Case in point, this fucking guy. I’ve given up trying to explain to him that I don’t want genocide any more than he claims not to, and I don’t even really like Kamala Harris, I just mostly think Trump in charge of the US is a biblical horror, and I want to avoid it. Somehow that keeps turning into that I love Kamala Harris and defend every part of her platform. I don’t even know why I’ve invested so much keyboard time into this conversation, other than the idea of someone promoting don’t-vote-ism is really alarming to me, and I want to say something when I see it.

    • Mambabasa@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      No it wasn’t. They were justifying and defending Harris and defending voting for Harris. Anti-anarchists don’t get to use anarchist spaces to push anti-anarchist talking points. They have literally almost every other Lemmy instance to push their voting agenda, why should they use ours?

      • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        How were they justifying Harris’s genocide policies? Isn’t defending voting for Harris defending the shitty choice?

        • Mambabasa@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Defending the shitty choice is defending the program of your vote. You can vote for the lesser evil, but do you need to defend the evil? Do you need to justify the evil? No. Just vote. You don’t need to defend or justify evil.

          • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Then how may I explain that voting for the lesser evil is the best course of action in my state’s scenario? And again, how were they justifying Harris’s genocide policies?

            • Mambabasa@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              Have you looked into vote swapping programs? If you want to vote principally yet remain tactical, look into that. But don’t go around providing ideological cover for genocide.

              • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Based on your argument, one cannot justify the person in the swing state voting for Harris? And again, how were they defending Harris’s genocide policies?

                edit:fixed think-o lol, safe→swing