• OBJECTION!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Unironically the correct thing to do, historically speaking. It was the “lesser evil” candidate who won and appointed Hitler as chancellor, which allowed him to seize power.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      what exactly are you talking about? Hitler became chancellor because the NSDAP had the largest support (~30%), he won because no one wanted to support the “lesser evil”, imagine if all the left-wing micro parties actually put together and voted just the SPD or KPD, it would literally have stopped Hitler.

      yes, Hitler happened because people refused to vote for the “lesser evil” because the ASPD, the KAPD, USPD, KPO, etc… couldn’t vote for the SPD

      • OBJECTION!
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        In the 1932 German Presidential Election, the candidates were Hitler, Hindenburg, and Thälmaan. The SPD endorsed “center-right” Hindenburg as a lesser evil to stop Hitler, and he won. Then he wound up appointing Hitler as chancellor anyway.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          and it got to that point after the conservatives already pulled a bunch of voter suppression and the 1933 election where the Nazis got most of the votes, and because the left vote was split, their combine greater total meant nothing

          • OBJECTION!
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Sure. Obviously, the split on the left was unfortunate and a major reason why Hitler came to power. Another reason being the declining economic conditions under the governing coalition of the SPD with the center-right.

            I don’t really see how that makes the case for lesser-evilism.