Now if only they could more clearly communicate when games are playable offline.

  • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I imagine the alternative way to combat kernel-level cheats would be asking player for all his game state data, validating it on a server?

    Wouldn’t work on peer-to-peer and you’d have to do a bunch of unnecessary compute(recalculating every tick if player-generated data is possible according to game rules) but its the only way I can think of.

    • levzzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Most games already do this lol Cheats usually don’t do anything that is technically impossible to do on a vanilla client, just highly improbable

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Or bring server browsers back and let server mods handle it.

      I’ve rarely, if ever, had a bad time using a server browser.

      A more modern idea. Put all the chesters into the same lobbies through matchmaking

      • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Don’t tell the client what’s going on outside its vision, I suppose? Add a small buffer to compensate for latency, so wall hack would be more of a “corner hack”.