I had to double-take since in Python a common alternative to trick?treat :notreat is (trick and treat) or notreat
But I don’t think this translates to overlapping circles very well. “trick implies treat” is only defined inside the trick circle, outside is undefined if treat is true or not.
I’m not going to draw a diagram, but here’s the “truth table” for A implies B:
A, B, A -> B
N, N, undefined
N, Y, undefined
Y, N, false
Y, Y, true
Haha might be? But I’m the same way and I’m pretty sure I’m not autistic…(ADHD though)
I think when you fill that spot between ((“knowledgable”) AND (“good-natured”)), you just like to share what you know if the poster’s sarcasm isn’t painfully apparent.
Never hurts to be kindly helpful. It reminds me of something my sister told me she tells her kids:
“Try to learn something new every day, and even if you don’t, teach something.” :)
Sure, but what about Trick IMPLIES Treat?
It would be ((trick nor treat) or treat) so basically all the non-circle region and the treat circle is filled…
After writing this, i am wondering if you actually needed the information or was it just the funny thing to say…
Guys am I autistic?
I had to double-take since in Python a common alternative to
trick ? treat : notreatis(trick and treat) or notreatBut I don’t think this translates to overlapping circles very well. “trick implies treat” is only defined inside the trick circle, outside is undefined if treat is true or not.
I’m not going to draw a diagram, but here’s the “truth table” for A implies B:
A, B, A -> B N, N, undefined N, Y, undefined Y, N, false Y, Y, trueHaha might be? But I’m the same way and I’m pretty sure I’m not autistic…(ADHD though)
I think when you fill that spot between ((“knowledgable”) AND (“good-natured”)), you just like to share what you know if the poster’s sarcasm isn’t painfully apparent.
Never hurts to be kindly helpful. It reminds me of something my sister told me she tells her kids:
“Try to learn something new every day, and even if you don’t, teach something.” :)