• TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess it really comes down to how one feels about Anarchy. Anarchists may be spot on in general, but I don’t have faith in us jumping to a stable stateless society anytime soon. If anything, I believe we need global organizations to solve global challenges. I want people to understand the nature of the state, but I also believe that government is less trouble than it’s worth. How else are we going to provide resources for projects that benefit the common good. Are we going to have to build and disband organizations every time we need to build a new project? That would take so much time without a common agreed upon framework that everyone agreed to.

    What’s really necessary is a united coalition built more democratically and with more teeth than the current UN but with checks on elitism. The issue is that building such a powerful tool is dangerous and could backfire, but I honestly don’t see a better way to tackle climate change, global capitalism, pandemics, space travel, and anything else that is large in scope.

    I think a global state is far more likely than a stateless society, so I would want to make it as good as possible. After all, what really matters is that we work with what we have and try to build something better.

    • dottedgreenline
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we’re suggesting possible future organisations, I’m with you about a global authority, but I want it to be run and maintained by some sort of artificial intelligence. There are currently no humans that I can think of that cannot fall victim to their own desires and become corrupt when faced with power. Just take that worry completely out of the equation. I would like to think at the point that we have that level of AI, that that technology will have already found solutions to a lot of our current global problems.

      Until then your proposal is sound!