• baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I feel like nobody here read the actual article.

    But I agree, it’s a ridiculous product with no use case.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It does however mean they are not concerned about selling out of current stock any time soon.

      • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Absolutely. The ‘hive mind’ here is so narrow minded and shallow that it’s super easy to predict 3/4 of the comments on any given article. Probably because the all the comments are from the same 5 people.

        I think about people on reddit complaining about reposts as I scroll past 50 posts of the same article posted to different instances by the same person.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This could have been an absolutely insane product, if they sold it without all the useless bullshit like the facial passthrough, at a decent price. As it is, especially given how fragile it is, it’s just a toy at best.

    It’s basically taken the exact opposite route of something like the Xbox Kinect, which turned from a toy into something people use in science

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I really don’t think head sets will ever be absolutely insane products.

      Lots of people just don’t want to strap a display to their face.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I can see a good use case if they make a decently functional lightweight headset that can replace multiple monitors, particularly for traveling

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Maybe for traveling. However, how many people really are going to buy an expensive electronic device for a few hours on a plane?

          That’s a pretty “upper class” luxury at best. Then, there’s nobody developing apps for it outside of a few streaming providers (maybe).

          Also, I work with multiple monitors all day and play games on those monitors at night, but I still appreciate that I can look away from the content and just “get up and get a drink” or look out the window and watch the birds outside of my office at the feeder.

          Also think about all this effort people put in to try and reduce their screen time… A VR headset is the antithesis of that objective.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            My specific use case is an IT professional that needs a lot of screen real estate but would prefer to live a more nomadic lifestyle. I’ve been toting portable monitors for a while and it works OK, but if something like this negates the need to do that it’d be awesome.

            That’s why I’m saying it’s a niche product, but the thing is they aren’t marketing it as anything else, and the price is ultimately pretty reasonable for brand new tech.

        • fl42v
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Idk, vr porn is creepy af. Or at least it used to be 5 yrs ago or so… Imagine a girl so huge one her tit bigger than your head, for example. So, yeah, I noped out pretty much instantly

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Your eyes on the front display is what i mean. Passthrough for your own vision is awesome

        • fl42v
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Now that’s not creepy at all

    • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      How they can justify that price for a headset with no third strap is beyond me. If I’m paying three grand for a headset, it had better feel like nothing is on my face.

    • interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Well, they forgot that hardware needs an actual purpose once you’re done with the market of people who purchase any new overpriced gadget to use as status symbol.

      Setting timers for eggs and pasta isn’t one.

    • tee9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Aw. A cute little comment that fits nicely with the article headline.

      Thanks for saving me time by giving your summarized dissection of the article and the implications it has for apples product.

      Oh and btw all tech products stop production at some point, because you know, apple isnt a dumbass that pumps out products without regard for demand as they are creating a successive model of the product.

      Stop scrolling. Start thinking.