FenrirIII@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 天前50 years of tax cuts for the rich failed to trickle down, economics study sayswww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square113fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down15cross-posted to: finanzen@feddit.orgdach@feddit.orgbrainworms@lemm.eecanada@lemmy.cafinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.worldsocialism@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1external-link50 years of tax cuts for the rich failed to trickle down, economics study sayswww.cbsnews.comFenrirIII@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 天前message-square113fedilinkcross-posted to: finanzen@feddit.orgdach@feddit.orgbrainworms@lemm.eecanada@lemmy.cafinance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.worldsocialism@lemmygrad.ml
minus-squareSurp@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-23 天前People should be always taxed more depending on how much more they make starting at 500,000$ a year for a single person imo. Once you hit that threshold you’re far above a normal human…far above.
minus-squareOmgpwnies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 天前If wages/salary are your primary/only source of income, you are not part of the wealthy class, even if it is $500k. Not even close.
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·3 天前Yeah, the problem being that they get compensated in shares, etc, above that point, meaning they dodge all the income tax anyway.
People should be always taxed more depending on how much more they make starting at 500,000$ a year for a single person imo. Once you hit that threshold you’re far above a normal human…far above.
If wages/salary are your primary/only source of income, you are not part of the wealthy class, even if it is $500k. Not even close.
Yeah, the problem being that they get compensated in shares, etc, above that point, meaning they dodge all the income tax anyway.