Many people enjoy discussing and judging the morals of characters in films, but that’s not the main point. Very few characters are entirely good or entirely evil, which tends to result in dull and poorly made movies. Regardless of whether viewers resonate with the story, they should show compassion for the characters. It’s important to interpret their motives and circumstances to understand what led them to make certain decisions and to reflect on ourselves.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s not unpopular, it’s wrong. Movies are criticized when the characters are one dimensional and lack moral nuance.

      • RayNASCAR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because it makes them more interesting. If I kick puppies just because I’m “evil” and I like to kick puppies, thats a boring one dimensional character.
        If I kick puppies because I genuinely believe that will cure cancer, then that’s more interesting.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Watch “The Dirty Dozen.”

          Every character has one objective; to get through the mission alive. The way the Major goes about manipulating each man’s desires is what makes it a great movie.

        • Vilian@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          Like Thanos, his argument is stupid, but he genuinely believed in that, and was powerful enough to do it

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think that’s why he worked as such a good villain, because you understood his reasoning, which was terrifying. He was wrong, but you understood it, and you as the viewer knew that made him so much more dangerous.

            If he just wanted to wipe out half of everyone that’d be boring and I wouldn’t feel invested.

        • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          But how do not find “justified” evil boring at this point, not every bad guy should be macbeth or dr.frankenstein

          It’s like that new stupid wicked witch movie that’s cooming out just because they are an antagonist doesn’t mean they can’t just be a villian, there can be decent characters that don’t need much back story or deep motivation like the joker or judge holden

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            The Joker has a motivation though, his worldview is that everything is chaos and he needs to prove it to everyone else. Especially Batman.

              • snooggums@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                It means that when he does things, they feel like things the Joker would do. In the Dark Knight he takes all the mob money and burns half of it, because that is a Joker thing to do. Two Face wouldn’t do that, because Two Face has different motivations.

                That is the reason to have motivation. It doesn’t need to be complex, just nuanced.

                • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Couldn’t two face just be written to have flipped a coin and ending up burning half the money as a result

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        To be interesting instead of one note.

        They don’t need to have extremes or even contradictions, just some kind of nuance other than good/bad. Spiderman’s moral code being based on not stopping the guy who then killed Uncle Ben in the early 2000s films is nuanced. Captain America standing up for doing the right thing based on his personal experience is nuanced.

        It doesn’t have to be moral nuance though. But that is one that gets a lot of criticism because it stands out so much for heroes and villains.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is “films are solely intended for you to evaluate morals of the characters” the popular opinion?

    Honestly I’d wager there are more people who dislike thought-provoking films than those who have to the opinion you’ve described. The most popular films in the world were intended to be fun

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I feel like that is more of a reflection on how audiences can critique a film beyond which parts were good and bad.

    Critique of cinematography requires an understanding of visual arts. Critique of sound design and scoring requires an education in music. In contrast, methods to critique characters and plot are taught in every high school literature class.

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah lately there has been a lot of “in grouping” with film and media characters. They are right cause they agree with me, kinda thing. But I’d say that’s never how most people handle movies. They just want the fun of a good story.

    But I think the stories don’t feel as fun if the characters don’t feel like they have a whole person with ups and downs behind them. And I think people would agree with you and me on that even if they can’t quite place what makes an aggrandizing pandering film lame.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This (supposedly unpopular) opinion could have used a couple of concrete examples.

    I would go further still: it is generally a bad idea in life to evaluate people’s morals. Make clear what your own are, try to live up them, and leave it at that.

    But that is another “unpopular” opinion altogether.