Whatever suits the needs of the people and facilitates the transition to a world in harmony with the ecosystems that inhabit it. Reduction to nonexistence is definitely a solution, and if its done i will support it.
Of the people? Environmental and health concerns are definitely important, but ethically, it is basic decency to not exploit non-human animals, and honestly, I’m in favor of considering non-human animals as “people.” I’d argue that it’s not just a solution in their case; it’s a moral obligation.
Whatever suits the needs of the people and facilitates the transition to a world in harmony with the ecosystems that inhabit it. Reduction to nonexistence is definitely a solution, and if its done i will support it.
Of the people? Environmental and health concerns are definitely important, but ethically, it is basic decency to not exploit non-human animals, and honestly, I’m in favor of considering non-human animals as “people.” I’d argue that it’s not just a solution in their case; it’s a moral obligation.