Five@slrpnk.net to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 22 hours agoGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up179arrow-down15cross-posted to: lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up174arrow-down1external-linkGay man rejected for asylum by Home Office told he is 'not truly gay' by judgemetro.co.ukFive@slrpnk.net to UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square30fedilinkcross-posted to: lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down1·21 hours agoI’m not saying he should have to, but is there a reason he can’t just submit, “video evidence”
minus-squareMaalus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·20 hours agoWas there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agoHence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-217 hours ago“You don’t look like you’re enjoying it enough”
I’m not saying he should have to, but is there a reason he can’t just submit, “video evidence”
Was there ever a hetero person seeking asylum that had to give their sex tape to a shitty official?
Hence the “I’m not saying he should have to”. To clarify, I’m asking if there’s some rule or law of evidence that prevents someone doing that.
Yeah, the basic laws for privacy.
I mean probably yeah.
“You don’t look like you’re enjoying it enough”