return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoT-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for usersarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1408arrow-down12cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ziparstechnica_index@rss.ponder.cat
arrow-up1406arrow-down1external-linkT-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for usersarstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square63fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ziparstechnica_index@rss.ponder.cat
minus-squareDaddleDew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·edit-222 hours agoIs there a technical term for when a company or corporation makes a statement that is a blatant bad faith argument like that? If none exists, I’d call it “Corporate massturbation”. Because they’re trying to jerk everyone off. Edit Here’s another one: “Corporate Anal Ostriching.” Because they’re shoving their heads up their own asses
minus-squareTenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·21 hours agoNot even close.
Is there a technical term for when a company or corporation makes a statement that is a blatant bad faith argument like that?
If none exists, I’d call it “Corporate massturbation”. Because they’re trying to jerk everyone off.
Edit Here’s another one: “Corporate Anal Ostriching.” Because they’re shoving their heads up their own asses
Propaganda
Gaslighting?
Not even close.