return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoT-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for usersarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1486arrow-down14cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ziparstechnica_index@rss.ponder.cat
arrow-up1482arrow-down1external-linkT-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for usersarstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square85fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ziparstechnica_index@rss.ponder.cat
minus-squareDaddleDew@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoIs there a technical term for when a company or corporation makes a statement that is a blatant bad faith argument like that? If none exists, I’d call it “Corporate massturbation”. Because they’re trying to jerk everyone off. Edit Here’s another one: “Corporate Anal Ostriching.” Because they’re shoving their heads up their own asses
minus-squareTenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 months agoNot even close.
Is there a technical term for when a company or corporation makes a statement that is a blatant bad faith argument like that?
If none exists, I’d call it “Corporate massturbation”. Because they’re trying to jerk everyone off.
Edit Here’s another one: “Corporate Anal Ostriching.” Because they’re shoving their heads up their own asses
Gaslighting?
Not even close.
Propaganda