• limitedduck@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Personally, I don’t think they should be aiming for 100 anymore, even if it was promised. That number was for the original pitch and was arbitrarily high since it was for a much shallower and easier to create game

    • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d gladly take a single functioning system rather than wait another 12 years of my life for this Kickstarter project to deliver.

    • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Today they announced that it was cut down to 5 and they will slowly work their way back up to 100 after launch (whenever that is)

      • limitedduck@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        It was a good decision. It was also smart of them to review the initial 100 planet goal to add some much needed context

    • jagermo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The original pitch also had dedicated servers and those are gone, sadly.

      • limitedduck@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        How are they gone? The current servers are hosted by CIG, there’s no p2p or player hosted servers. How would that even work for an MMO?

          • limitedduck@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I would say private server is more what you’re referring to, also CIG’s wording, but maybe agree to disagree. A quick search says that they haven’t cancelled that feature, but it’ll appropriately be the very last thing they work on

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              the common understanding of “dedicated server” is a server binary you can download and run yourself. a “private server” is usually still hosted on the company’s hardware.

              • limitedduck@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                I can understand you have different criteria for dedicated servers, but private servers are certainly not generally characterized by still being on 1st party hardware. You need only look at private servers for Minecraft, WoW, and the like

                • lime!@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  minecraft server binaries are a prime example of a “dedicated server”. tf2 is another. the alternative is a “listen server”, where one player acts as server. note that the term’s use in gaming has very little to do with the concept of a dedicated server in general use, aka a machine dedicated to running a service. in multiplayer games a dedicated server is just the name for a binary that contains no client.

                  anyway, the important distinction is whether the means for the game to continue existing is in the hands of the players or the company.

                  • limitedduck@awful.systems
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I understand, what confused me was your claim about the common understanding of the term when there are very much two valid and ubiquitous contexts.