I was seriously considering getting a PS5 until I saw the costs of the games + hardware.

  • iamak@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    All MS first party games are on PC because MS owns the PC ecosystem. Not because MS is friendlier💀

    • ExoMonk@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah while MS does also “own” the PC ecosystem via Windows, I’d bet MS probably makes more money off of an individual Xbox player than a PC player which should make them a bit less friendly to PC.

      For starters:

      • Steam takes a 30% cut of all sales
      • Sales and prices are usually much better on Steam than consoles so a lot of people wait for that number to drop over time
      • For most multiplayer games you need to pay for Xbox Gold which is upwards of $50-$60 a year (or gamepass which is even more, though you get more out of it).
      • You have to buy the console (this really depends on if MS actually makes money on console sales though) to play the game too.

      Microsoft doesn’t have to put their games on PC if they don’t want to and in the past they kind of didn’t (no one liked GFWL). They could totally go the exclusive route again, but I think MS knows that Xbox die-hard will buy an Xbox console and obviously buy the games on the xbox store for whatever it cost. PC players will also buy it if it’s a good game and a good price and, this is crucial, is on Steam.

      PC players are an untapped resource of potential customers; That’s why Sony finally decided to also cave and put their games on Steam. Money is money, but the difference is MS is betting big on GamePass and good-will right now since they are behind Sony in sales. I think because they’re behind Sony and trying to earn that good-will back, MS becomes more friendly to PC by putting their games on PC day one and on GamePass day one whereas Sony is still going with the 1-year (or more) PS5 exclusivity thing.

      The interesting thing will be if MS ever gets back on top again, who knows what that looks like, but it’ll probably suck.

      • iamak@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I agree with most of your points. Just wanted to point out that for MS games Linux compatibility is not planned. Not saying that other studios are supporting Linux, very few are but I wanted say that MS is Windows friendly not PC friendly.

        • ExoMonk@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s totally fair. I’m not sure where MS’ steam games fall on “working with linux” via Proton. I haven’t heard them being actively hostile like Bungie is with Destiny, but I’m not sure where that’s at.

      • iminahurry@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re last line reminds me of AMD Vs Intel battle. AMD was cheaper and better value for a lot of years till they were lagging behind Intel on performance. But the moment they attained parity with Intel with their Zen CPUs, they also started pricing their CPUs higher than Intel and also completely abandoned the low end market. Intel’s cheapest 12th gen CPU is currently more than 20% cheaper than AMDs cheapest Ryzen 5000 series CPU here in India.