• umbrella
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    i have the impression we could be there in several decades, not centuries?

    • medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      As a widely available, cost-effective treatment? Almost certainly not. We have yet to successfully genetically modify a human being and there’s a metric ton of legal and ethical red tape to deal with before we can even try.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        red tape doesnt take centuries to cut

        • medgremlin@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not necessarily, but the advancement of the technology and refinement of the technique are not progressing very quickly and since it’s so far away from human application, there’s not a lot of money/investment in it.

          • umbrella
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            there are clinical trials for gene therapy right now.

            i can see arguing that it isnt close, because it doesnt look close, but id bet it will come in decades rather than centuries.

            • medgremlin@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Gene therapy is not the same thing as CRISPR. CRISPR is modifying the genome before the organism makes it past 1 cell.

              • umbrella
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                thats not true. crispr gene therapy was just approved by the fda for sickle cell syndrome. the methods ability to change dna on living organisms is why its a big deal in the first place.

                one can easily look this up.

                • medgremlin@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  While that gene therapy does exist, it is not the same as what is being done here. The offspring of these mosquitos will have this same modified gene. The offspring of the recipients of the Sickle Cell gene therapy will not have the modified gene. We have the ability to alter a single human for their lifespan, but we do not have the ability to alter a human in such a way that their offspring will carry the same modification.