So I’ve heard and seen the newest launch, and I thought for a private firm it seemed cool they were able to do it on their own, but I’m scratching my head that people are gushing about this as some hail mary.

I get the engineering required is staggering when it comes to these rocket tests, but NASA and other big space agencies have already done rocket tests and exploring bits of the moon which still astounds me to this day.

Is it because it’s not a multi billion government institution? When I tell colleagues about NASA doing stuff like this yeaaaars ago they’re like “Yea yea but this is different it’s crazy bro”

Can anyone help me understand? Any SpaceX or Tesla fans here?

  • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because they are impressive in the way NASA was. Which is the problem - we should be doing this as a nation and not subsidizing whatever a billionaire fancies at the moment.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exactly. It’s concerning that a private individual is allowed to do this, much less without government competition. It’s like we’ve forgotten that the boosters that got us to the moon were the same missiles that terrorized Britain.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes. It’s down right scary to think about what the consequences of private ownership will mean.

        In best case it will turn into a profitable business which means burning a shit ton of fuel in the atmosphere and leaving tons of garbage in orbit.

        Yes it’s impressive that it’s possible, but is it less impressive if it means screwing up the option for others to launch anything in 50 years just because the richest man on earth right now wanted to earn more money.

        It’s a small step for a large corporation, but it’s a large step backwards for humanity.

        I’d rather see new technologies like the slingshot launches becoming successful than seeing SpaceX launching the same old dirty rockets over and over for profit.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      eh, it will probably be good thing to just commercialize space buses and leave NASA to the science.

        • treadful@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          It would allow NASA to focus on science and not trivialities of moving things into orbit. Thought that was well implied.

            • treadful@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              The science is largely figured out. Takes engineering and refinement, sure. But we know how to do these things.

              • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                The science of space flight is largely figured out? That will be news to the scientists on spacex’s staff. I don’t think you know what you’re talking about