• Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    When they are rarely or never the bad guys, they are saying more than just that they exist.

    • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s impossible to regularly be the bad guy if you are not regularly an acting participant of the story, or even in a position of power.

      Do you actually believe Princess Peach is “women are better” propaganda? Nice stats you got…

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      On the one hand, having representation limited to villainous roles is bad. (See early depictions of black people and think about “Cowboys vs. Indians”)

      On the other hand…there are plenty of women in villainous roles. I can also think of a few notable gay and disables villains.

      Hell, Breaking Bad is a great example of having all of them, and even though it aired before “woke” became a bad word to some people, nobody ever complained about it being too progressive or anything.