usernamesAreTricky to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agoTrump insults Detroit during speech … in Detroitwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1496arrow-down19cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
arrow-up1487arrow-down1external-linkTrump insults Detroit during speech … in Detroitwww.theguardian.comusernamesAreTricky to politics @lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square73fedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.world
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoNow now, while that might seem the perfect solution, we can’t violate the Geneva convention.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThe Geneva convention doesn’t say anything about that song. So it’s all good. Right?
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoActually, I think it probably does specify that particular song . . .
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoWell, it’s a convention and not a hard and fast rule, anyway.
minus-squareMegaUltraChicken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI think if you just used a 3 second clip on loop that should pass constitutional muster.
minus-squarebluewing@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoMeh, it’s never a war crime the first time. Go for it.
Now now, while that might seem the perfect solution, we can’t violate the Geneva convention.
The Geneva convention doesn’t say anything about that song. So it’s all good. Right?
Actually, I think it probably does specify that particular song . . .
Well, it’s a convention and not a hard and fast rule, anyway.
I think if you just used a 3 second clip on loop that should pass constitutional muster.
Meh, it’s never a war crime the first time. Go for it.