As governor he got his state signed on to the national popular vote interstate compact

  • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    As a Washingtonian I also dream of that. It is ridiculous that only people in states that are kinda purple have their opinions heard.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      I’d prefer at least to maintain districts, 1 vote for 1 district, remove states and the extra two votes. Each district exactly the same number of people, give or take 1%. Give the low populated counties out in the boonies a chance to be heard.

      But failing that, straight popular vote is a better option than the current cluster fuck.

      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        If it is equal representation, why does having districts make the rural vote heard? Whether it is one person one vote or 100,000 people one vote it won’t make a difference.

        Everyone will still have their representatives and senators to hear them. In fact I think we need to increase the number of representatives. It needs to be a number that a person can reasonably represent. Say 50 or 100 thousand people per representative. This would also help with gerrymandering as having a lot of small districts would make everyone’s voice louder.

        But for national positions like the president, we should have proportional votes, preferably with getting rid of first past the post that got us stuck with the two party system to start with.

        • Zorg@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 minutes ago

          Congress of going to need to expand a little bit, if all 3,330-6,660 reps should be able to gather at the same time.