• NegativeInf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    By 3 frames per second at over 260 fps for a savings of 80 watts.

    Spend your watts on a better graphics card babe.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be honest, I don’t think that’s too bad of a trade-off, but I can see how this would be controversial in the context of desktop computing.

      • Vik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        it’s bizarre how IHVs will absolutely crank power for such marnigal gains in average fps :(

        I’m happy ARL is taking this approach.

  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    They admitted this when they announced the ultra core series.

    I’m not exactly sure how the ultra core series are better, but the evaluation team at my company determined that the ultra 7 265H outperformed the last i9 in an equivalent laptop.

    I’m not impressed with it so far as the damn thing won’t work with the dock >.<

  • hawgietonight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    So this is what marketing can spit out in their best possible light. That means it can only go downhill from here. Not very promising.