• Fifteen_Two@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    She may. It really depends on how she left. But it seems like an arbitrator has already deemed that the demolishion permit was issued to the development company in bad faith, so that is probably a good sign for her!

    I am hopeful she is compensated, and that this is a reminder to Langford that this type of activity will cost developers in the long run. I also hope this alerts any other tenants who were victim of these types of practices to come forward and test their case. Ridiculous system, but it what we got.

    • AChiTenshi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The unfortunate reality is it will like take years to work it’s way through before she sees any sort of compensation.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that compensation is sitting in a business trust collecting interest that they won’t have to pay to her, so they’re literally going to make money off this even if they have to recompense her.